Agronomic Performance Evaluation of Ten Sugarcane Varieties under Wonji-Shoa Agro-Climatic Conditions

Abiy Getaneh Zewude, Feyissa Tadesse, Netsanet Ayele

Abstract


Field experiment was conducted at Wonji/Shoa Sugar Estate during 2007 to 2012 cropping season, to evaluate and select sugarcane varieties with better agronomic performances under Wonji/Shoa agro-ecological condition. Ten sugarcane varieties: namely DB 228/57, B 60267, CO 622, CO 678, B 4906, B 5736, CP 36/111, CP 69/1059, B 59250, and E188/56 were compared with the check variety B52 298. They were evaluated in completely randomized block design with three replications. Result indicated that none of the varieties in both light and heavy clay soil of the trials could outshine the check variety B52 298 in terms of average cane and sugar yield. However, the varieties CO 622 and E 188/56 produced higher mean cane and sugar yields (ton ha-1 month-1) than the rest variety in both light and heavy clay soil fields of Wonji/Shoa, which was at par with the check variety B52 298. Besides variety DB 228/57, B 60267 and B 4906 responded well in sugar yield for light clay soil unlike CO 678 and CP 69/1059 which was better in heavy clay soil. Therefore, the sugarcane varieties CO 622 and E188/56 in both soil; whereas DB 228/57, B 60267 and B 4906 in light soil; CO 678 and CP69-1059 in heavy soil should be verified further on large commercial fields under agro-climatic conditions of Wonji/Shoa.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Burayu, W., and A. Chinawong. 2006. Agronomic Performances and Industrial Characterstics of Sugarcane Varieties Under Finchaa Valley Conditions, Oromiya, East Africa. Kamphaengsaen Acadamy Journal. 4(1): 27 – 33.

Chattha, A.A., M. Rafique, M. Afzal, F. Ahmed and M. Bilal. 2006. Prospects of sugar industry & sugarcane cultivation in Punjab. Proceedings of 41th Annual Convention of Pakistan Society of Sugar Technologists held at Rawalpindi, August 21-22, 2006. pp: 173-181.

Chattha, M.U., and E. Ehsanullah. 2003. Agro-quantitative and qualitative performance of different cultivars and strains of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Pakistan Sugar J. 18(06):2-5.

Dillewijn, N.C. 1952. Botany of Sugarcane. Chionica Botanica Waltham, U.S.A. 230p.

EL-Geddaway, I.H., D.G. Darwesh., A.A. El- Sherbiny., E. Eldin and A. El- Hadi. 2002. Effect of row spacing and number of buds/seed setts on growth characters of ratoon crops for some sugarcane varieties. Pakistan Sugar J. 17: 7-14.

Gill, M.B. 1995. Physio agronomic studies on flat versus pit plantation of autumn and spring sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad. pp: 49-89.

Gomez, R.A., and A.A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research (2nd ed.) John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp: 97-129.

Javed, M.A., A. Khatri, I.A. Khan, R. Ansari, M.A. Sidiqui, N.A. Bahar, M.H. Khanzada and R. Khan. 2002. Comparative performance of elite sugarcane clones for yield and quality characteristics. Pakistan Sugar J. 17: 71-75.

Kakde, J.R. 1985. Sugar cane Production. Renu printers, New Delhi. India.

Keerio, H.K., R.N. Panhwar, Y.M. Memon, M.Y. Araen, M. Chohan and B.R. Qazi. 2003. Qualitative and quantitative performance of some promising and commercial sugarcane varieties under agro-climatic conditions of Thatta. Pakistan J. Applied Sci. 3(10-12): 670- 673.

Khan, M.A., H.K. Keerio, S. Junejo, R.N. Panhwar, M.A. Rajput, Y.M. Memon and B.R. Qazi. 2003. Evaluation of new sugarcane genotypes developed through fuzz. Correlation of cane yield and yield components. Pakistan J. Applied Sci. 3(4): 270-273.

Mian, A.M. 2006. Sugarcane variety composition in Pakistan. Proceedings of Seminars on Agriculture. Organized by Pakistan Society of Sugar Technologists held at Faisalabad on 19th June 2006. pp: 107-121.

Nazir, M.S., H. Ali, M. Saeed, A. Ghafar and M. Tariq .1997. Juice quality of different sugarcane genotypes as affected by pure and blend plantation. Pakistan Sugar J. 12:4:12-14.

SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2002. Institute of Applied Statistics and SAS programming Language. Cary, North Carolina.

Sharma, M.L. and T. Agarwal. 1985. Studies on the cane and sugar yield contributing characters in sugarcane cultivars. Indian Sugar. 35 (2): 91-101.

Stoskopf, N.C, D.T Tomes, and B.R Christie. 1999. Plant breeding: theory and practice. Scientific publishers, India.

Sugar Corporation. 2011. Research and Training 2011-2015 strategic plan, Ethiopia. 22p.

Sundara, B., P. Sankaranarayanan, and M.B.G.R. Batcha. 1992. Varietal characteristics affecting ratooning potential of sugarcane. Sugarcane. (6): 1-4.

Sundra, B. 2000. Sugarcane cultivation. VIKAS Publishing House Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. India.

Tesfaye, E. 2001. Review of Sugarcane Variety Adaptability Studies at the Sugar Estates of Ethiopia. In: Review of Research on Sugarcane in Ethiopia. III – Agronomy and crop physiology. pp: 4 – 8.


Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2015 The Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources Sciences

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.